Legal Opinion
Sillery v. Fagan
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 24, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
120 N.J. Super. 416 (1972)
294 A.2d 624
WILLIAM R. SILLERY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES FAGAN AND MARIA FAGAN, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Bergen County District Court.
Decided July 24, 1972.
Mr. Harry H. Chandless, Jr., Attorney for Plaintiff.
Mr. John J. Dudas, Jr. (Bergen County Legal Services Assurance Corporation), Attorney for co-defendant, Cross-Claimant Maria Fagan.
PAUL R. HUOT, J.D.C.
The question which this case presents is based upon a well established theory, namely, that it is the husband's responsibility to provide "necessities" for his wife. Specifically, the issue is…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kingsley International Pictures Corp. v. Regents of the UniversitySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Dunham's & Co. v. DzurinkoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Kenelia v. Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979