May Co. v. Jones

OPINION

By DRUCKER, J.

The plaintiff stated in its petition that there was due it from the defendant a balance on account for necessaries, wearing apparel and household goods. The defendant, Lela Jones, contends that she is not liable primarily for the neces*440saries furnished to herself and her minor child but urges that the liability for debts incurred is upon the husband, James Jones. The evidence adduced was to the effect that Lela Jones married James Jones and that her son, Kenneth by a previous marriage, livéd at the home of James Jones. The evidence further showed that during the time of…