Legal Opinion

Utley v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 20, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants filed amended and supplemental bill of complaint for the purpose of obtaining a ■decree cancelling certain paving certificates as cloud on the title of plaintiff to certain lands and for injunctive relief.

The complainants’ claim to the right of having the relief prayed decreed was grounded upon the contention that Chapter 9914, Special Acts of the Legislature of 1933, under which the paving certificates were issued, was void because of the several provisions thereof being in conflict with certain provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions.

General and special demurrers were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. City of Fort Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. City of Fort Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. McSween v. State Live Stock Sanitary BoardSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Utley v. St. PetersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Utley v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. The City of Hollywood v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Patterick v. Carbon Water Conservancy Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Rafkin v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API