Legal Opinion
People v. T.J.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2010No. C061890PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
A juvenile wardship petition was filed alleging that T.J., aged 15 (the minor), came within the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 in that he committed three forcible lewd acts on a child under age 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)(1)—counts one through three.) The court found that the minor was not eligible for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) because the alleged offenses are listed in section 707, subdivision (b). (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 707, subd. (b)(6), 790, subd. (a)(2).)
Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the prosecution dismissed count…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Michael G. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- MARTHA C. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. Kenneth J.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Landrum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Joshua S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- In re Jonathan A. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re M.B. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015