Legal Opinion
MARTHA C. v. Superior Court of San Diego County
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 2003No. D041101PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
A Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 602 petition alleged that Martha C. possessed marijuana for sale and transported marijuana. Martha was eligible for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) pursuant to section 790 et seq. 2 She admitted the allegations of the petition but the trial court refused to proceed pursuant to that procedure. Martha seeks a writ of mandate requiring the trial court grant her DEJ.
Background
A. Deferred Entry of Judgment
The DEJ provisions of section 790 et seq. were enacted as part of Proposition 21, The Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of…
2Cited by20 opinions
- People v. Kenneth J.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. Usef S.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. C.W.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Joshua S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- G.C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.