Legal Opinion · Dissent
Battery Patents Corporation v. Coe
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 13, 1937No. 6871Published
1DissentMartin, Chief Justice
The applicant, George S. Lewis, filed in the Patent Office an application for a patent for a design for a bicycle guard and lamp. He afterwards assigned his right and interest in the application to the present appellant, Battery Patents Corporation. An illustration of the design in question appears in the majority opinion of the court.
The application was considered and denied by the Primary Examiner in the Patent Office upon the following references: Humble, 1,069,550, August 5, 1913; Sawyer (Design), 92,114, April 24, 1934; Advertising Booklet of the Series 50 Buick Straight Eight for 1932,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Berlinger v. Busch Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.