Straus v. Renasant Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Boggs, Judge.
Barry and Denise Straus appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Renasant Bank (“Renasant”) and Anthony Stancil in this case involving their liability as guarantors of a real estate acquisition and development loan obtained by Interstate South, LLC.1 They contend that the trial court erred *272because (1) the D’Oench Duhme doctrine2 does not preclude their defenses and counterclaim; (2) the D’Oench Duhme doctrine does not preclude their tort claims against Stancil individually; (3) genuine issues of material fact preclude the award of summary judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Stiefel v. SchickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Megel v. DonaldsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Lindley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Agsouth Farm Credit, Aca v. D. Chris WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- Burds v. HipesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Christopher Burds v. Jeanne Bynum HipesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- David M. Rubenstein v. Sabetay PalatchiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
- Frankie B. Sheppard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.