Legal Opinion
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. C.R. England, Inc.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided July 13, 2004No. 2:02-CV-950 TSPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON ALL PENDING MOTIONS
STEWART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs are independent truck drivers, known as Owner-Operators, who filed this action in federal court in California alleging that the defendant motor carrier, C.R. England, failed to comply with the federal leasing regulations governing leases of equipment and drivers in interstate trucking — namely the Truth-in-Leasing Regulations found at 49 C.F.R. Part 376. On C.R. England’s motion, venue was transferred to this district. C.R. England seeks to stay this case and compel arbitration or, in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers v. Landstar SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Performance Team Freight Systems, Inc. v. AlemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Landstar System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Landstar System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.