Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Boenning & Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 1975No. Civ. A. 72-427PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BRODERICK, District Judge.
On March 1, 1972, this “Pearlstein” doctrine case was brought by the plaintiff under the theory that the defendant brokerage house should have liquidated certain unsettled bond transactions as required by the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation “T” 1 and that the failure of the brokerage house to so liquidate resulted in losses being suffered by the plaintiff. Plaintiff now seeks to recover these losses.
Following a jury verdict placing liability on the defendant, the defendant has moved for a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, contending that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- John B. Janigan v. Frederick B. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,710 Stanley S. Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Azalea Meats, Inc. v. Victor Muscat and Edward KrockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Samuel STERN, Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Margaret L. Pollard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Guardian Life Insurance of America v. American Guardian Life Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- McNeal v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1977
- Marx & Co., Inc. v. DINERS'CLUB, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.