Legal Opinion
In re Wayne M.
New York City Family Court
Decided October 4, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley Gartenstein, J.
The within prosecution for attempted robbery in the first degree was dismissed upon motion of the presentation agency when it was unable to proceed to trial owing to the fact that complainant, a tourist, permanently left the United States for Sweden.
The presentation agency now moves for an order pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 375.1 of the Family Court Act, to prevent sealing. The statutory basis for such relief requires a finding that sealing would not be in the interests of justice, and tracks a similar statutory scheme applicable to adult…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Taylor v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re David H.New York Family Court · 1984
- Bursac v. SuozziNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- In re Paul R.New York City Family Court · 1991
- People v. Tarver, New York County Courts1991
- State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.