Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Finch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1999No. 62938-2Published

1DissentTalmadge, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on the issue of Finch’s restraint by the trial court. The majority essentially negates our decision in State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d 863, 887-88, 959 P.2d 1061 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 (1999), and ignores the trial court’s findings of fact on the restraint questions we specially remanded to the trial court to decide.

Our decisions on in-court restraint of a defendant during *873trial are clear. The defendant’s right to a fair trial under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution is violated if…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API