Florida Bar v. Grosso
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review the complaint of The Florida Bar and the referee’s report regarding alleged ethical breaches by attorney Domenic Leonard Grosso. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The referee has recommended a fifteen-day suspension. The Florida Bar seeks review, requesting a ninety-one day suspension. For the reasons stated herein, we order a ninety-day suspension followed by a one-year probationary period.
FACTS
On October 13, 1998, the Bar filed a complaint against respondent, alleging misconduct as to respondent’s duties as guardian of property he agreed to keep in his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- The Florida Bar v. SchultzSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- The Florida Bar v. GrossoSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. David Leonard RossSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- The Florida Bar v. David Leonard RossSupreme Court of Florida · 2014