Legal Opinion
United States v. Ralph E. Cades Appeal of William N. Bloom
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 1974No. 73-1730PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
Appellant, William Bloom, contests the district court judgment, entered after a jury verdict, finding him guilty of conspiring with and aiding and abetting one Ralph Cades in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 656 (1970), willful misapplication of federally-insured bank funds by a bank officer, director, agent or employee. 1 Bloom was president of Scooper-Dooper, Inc. which maintained checking accounts at City Bank of Philadelphia (“City Bank”) and Pennsylvania Bank of New Jersey (“Pennsauken Bank”). This case grew out of Bloom’s operation of a “check-kiting”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Marie Moses, Alias Marie KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Stephen R. Benchwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Robert H. DochertyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Government of Virgin Islands v. GereauCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Bobby StatenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. William A. Raper, United States of America v. Eli B. Childs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. PearlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.