Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hooten v. Pennsylvania College of Optometry

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-4129PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

James McGirr KELLY, District Judge.

Teresa Hooten has brought an action against Pennsylvania College of Optometry (PCO) for (1) violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.) (2) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (3) wrongful discharge from her employment. Her husband has filed a pendent claim for loss of consortium. PCO has moved for the court to strike the request for compensatory and punitive damages and to dismiss all tort claims for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted.

When presented with a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. WeathersbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miller v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API