Legal Opinion

Rulnick v. Shulman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 11, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Prior to August 8th, 1919, Jonathan G. D. Newton had owned a large tract of land on both sides of Newton Street, extending north from Park Street, in the city of Hartford, platted it into building lots, and sold a number of them. Each of the deeds given by him provided that the grantees should not erect upon any part of the land conveyed any dwelling-house containing more than two tenements, or worth less than $5,000, or to be used for store or business purposes. The defendants in this action are present owners of these lots. In 1919, owners of lots so conveyed brought an action against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Armstrong v. LeveroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Torrence v. SheddIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Richardson v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mall v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. City of Bridgeport v. Equitable Title & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Rice v. FarrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BernblumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Sleeping Giant Park Asso. v. Connecticut Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API