Legal Opinion
Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1995No. 94-2992PublishedCited by 116 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.
Charles Dring (Dring) appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court1 for the Eastern District of Missouri, granting summary judgment in favor of defendant McDonnell Douglas Corporation (MDC) on Dring’s claims of age discrimination. For reversal, Dring argues the district court erred in finding: (1) his administrative complaint was untimely, and (2) he failed to make out a prima facie ease of age discrimination. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
I
In mid-1990, in response to a negative economic situation, MDC began a series of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Johanna McDonough v. Anoka CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Jessie v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. v. SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 1996
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.