Legal Opinion
Roche Products, Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceuticals Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 13, 1983No. CV 83-4312PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court as an action to permanently enjoin certain acts as threatened infringement of a patent. Suit was originally filed in U.S. District Court in New Jersey pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 283, and under the grant of jurisdiction provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1338. After District Judge H. Lee Sarokin issued a temporary restraining order on September 2, 1983, defendant was granted a change of venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). District Judge Debevoise transferred venue to the Eastern District of New York for a hearing on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maxon Premix Burner Company, Inc. v. Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Kaz Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Kaz Manufacturing Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Bonsack Mach. Co. v. UnderwoodU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roche Products, Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Allergan, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002