Legal Opinion

Kaz Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 21, 1963No. 27997_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This is a civil action in two counts, count 1 charging patent infringement and count 2 unfair competition. The patents in suit are Design Patent No. 181,257 for “Vaporizer Head Unit”, Patent No. 2,885,750 for “Cover and Removable Spout Extension for a Vaporizer” and Patent No. 2,387,156 for “Elec trie Vaporizer”. 1 Before answer, defendant moved for a partial summary judgment dismissing count 1 on the ground of non-infringement. Judge Tyler granted the motion and also dismissed, without prejudice, count 2 for lack of pendent jurisdiction. His opinion is reported in D.C.,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
  3. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Chesterfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  5. Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  3. Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
  4. Maltais v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  5. Levin v. Ripple Twist Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API