Legal Opinion

Brattin v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus against the respondents as members of the Board of Civil Service Commissioners to compel the respondent Dana, as commissioner, to certify the name of the petitioner for appointment to police service in the city of Boston as of January 12, 1920, and to compel the respondent board to take such action as may be necessary to continue further the name of the petitioner upon the list of persons eligible for such certification. The case was heard by a single justice of this court who thereafter entered the following order: “ In the above entitled case it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Ex Parte RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. McCarthy v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Commonwealth v. National Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Smith v. Commissioner of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. McNeil v. Mayor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. Toothaker v. School Committee of RocklandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Security Co-operative Bank v. Inspector of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API