Smith v. Commissioner of Public Works
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. It was heard.by a single justice,* who refused to issue the writ so far as it rested in his discretion, and reported the case.
Mandamus is not a writ of right, and it is granted only in the exercise of sound judicial discretion. Hill v. County Commissioners, 4 Gray, 414. Murray v. Stevens, 110 Mass. 95. McCarthy v. Street Commissioners, 188 Mass. 338, 340. The facts are that the city council of Boston appropriated in May, 1911, $300,000 to be expended by the department of public works for the purchase of gas lamps and other apparatus for street…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCarthy v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Murray v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
3Cited by10 opinions
- Westerman v. MimsTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Brooks v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- McLean v. Mayor of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.