Legal Opinion
Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Technology CoO., LTD., a/k/a Qingdao Follow the Trend Network Technology CoO., LTD. a/k/a Qingdao Mars Culture Media Co., LTD d/b/a UCOOLME and Vivicute Limited
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 18, 2025No. 1:25-cv-04183Unknown
1Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_11/18/2025 LASHIFY, INC., : Plaintiff, : : 25-cv-4183 (LJL) -v- : : MEMORANDUM AND QINGDAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CoO., LTD. : ORDER a/k/a QINGDAO FOLLOW THE TREND : NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CoO., LTD. a/k/a : QINGDAO MARS CULTURE MEDIA Co., LTD : d/b/a UCOOLME and VIVICUTE LIMITED, : Defendants. : we KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Lashify, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Lashify”) moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2) and Local…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Parsons v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Levin v. Tiber Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.