State v. Mossman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant appeals from an order amending two judgment orders nunc pro tunc to reflect the trial court’s oral imposition of two concurrent five-year minimum sentences, which had been omitted from the written orders. He argues that the trial court was without authority to correct the orders in these circumstances.
In 1982, the circuit court entered two orders which adjudicated defendant guilty of two counts of burglary in the first degree, sentenced him to two concurrent terms in prison for a maximum of 20 years, suspended execution of his sentences and placed him on probation for five years. At…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PrihodaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. LorrahUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.