Legal Opinion
State v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 2002No. C9-99-2021Published
1Opinion of the Court
637 N.W.2d 845 (2002)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Signe Elissee PEARSON, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C9-99-2021.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 17, 2002.
Michael F. Crommett, Assistant State Public Defender, Minneapolis, Mary M. McMahon, McMahon & Associates, Criminal Defense, Ltd., Roseville, for Appellants.
Michael A. Hatch, State Attorney General, Doug Johnson, Washington County Attorney, Eric C. Thole, Assistant County Attorney, Stillwater, for Respondents.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
A sentencing circle, addressing the proper sanction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. SchmitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- McNeice v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.