Legal Opinion

State v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 2000No. C9-99-2021PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

Appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred by staying adjudication of felony theft charges against respondent Signe Elissee Pearson. Respondent moves to strike a portion of appellant’s brief and appendix. We reverse and remand, and grant respondent’s motion to strike.

FACTS

Pearson was charged by complaint with one count each of felony theft by wrongfully obtaining public assistance and felony theft by wrongfully obtaining food stamps in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 256.98, subd. 1, 393.07, subd. 10(c)(1), 609.52, subd. 3(2)-(3) (1994). The complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. ThomaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LemingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API