Legal Opinion

Detroit Heating & Lighting Co. v. Kemp

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland

Decided October 27, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Detroit Heating & Righting Company against Clarence M. Kemp. On motion to retax costs.

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

The complainant instituted this suit in equity upon patent 577,759, for an improvement in device for regulating the quality of gas. A decree was entered in favor of complainant, sustaining the patent, and! awarding an injunction and an accounting and costs. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eourth Circuit, and the decree was affirined, with costs. ' 175 Red. 779, 99 C. C. A. 351.

The clerk of this court has taxed the costs in this court, allowing in favor of the complainant against the defendant, among others, the following items:

Printing of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Tesla Electric Co. v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Jordan v. Agawam Woollen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1869
  4. Kemp v. Detroit Heating & Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  5. Lowry v. StoryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. MacNeil v. Hearst CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958
  3. Corn Products Refining Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  4. Walker v. HaywoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Vogt Bros. Mfg.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API