Legal Opinion

Walker v. Haywood

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 18, 1985No. 1481, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

This is an appeal from the ratification of an auditor’s report disallowing in part attorney’s fees and certain other expenses incurred in connection with the foreclosure of a deed of trust and related bankruptcy proceedings. Appellants charge that the disallowance, or most of it, was the consequence of two court policies that were in fact unauthorized rules of court improperly applied. While we agree that the trial judge misapplied the policies and reverse, we disagree with appellants on the rule of court question.

I. Background

Appellants John C. Walker, III, and John W. Gill,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. American Surety Co. of NY v. SampsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. In Re CareyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1981
  4. Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Ralkey v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allfirst Bank v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. In Re Marcus J.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Maddox v. CohnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Baltimore XV Props. V. Newsteps' Choice N.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API