Legal Opinion
MacNeil v. Hearst Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 11, 1958No. Civ. A. 1953PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
This is an action of libel. The complaint was docketed by the Clerk on December 31, 1957, having been received by mail from Angus M. MacNeil, who described himself as an Attorney at Law of Somerville, Massachusetts. On the day the complaint was filed the Clerk of the Court notified Mr. MacNeil that a Rule of Court required that local counsel be obtained insofar as the corporate plaintiff was concerned, stating that the individual plaintiff had a statutory right to appear. The Clerk stated that the Court would appreciate the obtaining of local counsel in accordance with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. HvassSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Heiskell v. MozieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Frank Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
- United States v. 9.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Marquette County, Michigan, Beico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Simbraw, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Southwest Express Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.