Marc v. Pinkard
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtSulzberger, J.
This action was for services rendered and materials furnished by plaintiff to the defendants as copartners. All of the defendants appeared in the action by an attorney. By their answer they admitted that they were copartners, except that it is denied that the defendant Pinkard was a copartner at the time of the commencement of the action. The denial is frivolous. None of the defendants appeared at the trial, an inquest was taken, and judgment was entered thereon on December 20, 1927. The judgment is against “ the defendant Perry W. Cheney et al.” It is based on a decision which directs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Porter v. . International Bridge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Goldberg v. MarkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Whitestone General HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1988