(PC) Harding v. Correctional Health Services
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-00922 KJM SCR P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 13 CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants Holt (ECF No. 50) and Mencias (ECF No. 51) have 19 filed separate motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned 20 recommends that defendants’ respective motions be granted. 21…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.