United States v. Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($17,900.00) in United States Currency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
This is a civil-forfeiture case, which is why the plaintiff is the United States of America and the defendant is a pile of cash. The government claims that the cash is subject to forfeiture because it is connected to the “exchange [of] a controlled substance,” i.e., drug trafficking. 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). Appellants, themselves flesh and blood, have intervened in this action, offering sworn testimony that the money is theirs and wholly unrelated to drugs. According to the government, that testimony is so implausible that appellants lack Article III standing to intervene.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. $31,000.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Damian PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Dyer v. McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurants, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.