South Dakota Department of Transportation v. Freeman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentHenderson, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
As Chief Justice Fosheim noted in Bayer v. Johnson, 349 N.W.2d 447, 450 (S.D. 1984): “State officials, including supreme court justices, are by constitutional mandate required to take an oath or affirmation to support the constitution of this state. S.D. Const. Art. XXI, § 3.” Thus, if a patent constitutional dilemma arises in a case, although not raised by either party, this Court may decide that constitutional question on its own motion. Id. “Courts, above all, must jealously protect the integ*245rity of the constitution.” Id. Failure to meet that which is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.