Legal Opinion · Dissent

South Dakota Department of Transportation v. Freeman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1985No. 14969Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

As Chief Justice Fosheim noted in Bayer v. Johnson, 349 N.W.2d 447, 450 (S.D. 1984): “State officials, including supreme court justices, are by constitutional mandate required to take an oath or affirmation to support the constitution of this state. S.D. Const. Art. XXI, § 3.” Thus, if a patent constitutional dilemma arises in a case, although not raised by either party, this Court may decide that constitutional question on its own motion. Id. “Courts, above all, must jealously protect the integ*245rity of the constitution.” Id. Failure to meet that which is…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. City of St. Louis v. Butler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Darnall v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API