Legal Opinion
Black v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 18, 1994No. Civ. 3-92-628PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff William C. Black, Jr. commenced this action against the United States of America and several unknown individuals who are alleged to have been officials of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), and Department of State (“State Department”); Black alleges that the United States is liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2674 (1988), for the intentional infliction of emotional distress occasioned by the individual defendants. He further alleges that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995