Legal Opinion

Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits Section

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 12, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2021-1281Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHOO WASHBURN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1281 (TJK) U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE- MENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Choo Washburn, proceeding pro se, sought to compel the Office of Personnel Management to redirect her portion of her ex-husband’s federal-retirement-benefit payments to her directly, rather than having it paid to her court-appointed guardian. But the Court dismissed most of her claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Congress has vested the exclu- sive power to decide such issues in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership v. Riaso, LLC (In Re Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  4. Larry Klayman v. Neomi RaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  5. More v. O'neillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API