Washburn v. Court Ordered Benefits Section
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHOO WASHBURN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-1281 (TJK) U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE- MENT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Choo Washburn, proceeding pro se, sought to compel the Office of Personnel Management to redirect her portion of her ex-husband’s federal-retirement-benefit payments to her directly, rather than having it paid to her court-appointed guardian. But the Court dismissed most of her claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Congress has vested the exclu- sive power to decide such issues in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership v. Riaso, LLC (In Re Hope 7 Monroe Street Ltd. Partnership)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Larry Klayman v. Neomi RaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- More v. O'neillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.