Legal Opinion
Ellenberger v. Espinosa
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1994No. E011662PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, J
Plaintiff, James Dennis Ellenberger, D.D.S., appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of defendant Jennie Espinosa, (hereinafter defendant) based on the trial court’s action of sustaining her demurrer to plaintiffs second amended complaint without leave to amend.
Procedural Background
On April 10, 1992, plaintiff filed his second amended complaint against defendant and several other parties, including the State of California. Five causes of action were alleged against defendant: (1) conspiracy to violate his civil rights (42 U.S.C. § 1983); (2) slander per…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- North American Chemical Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- California Medical Ass'n v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.