In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against 97-29
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility issued a private admonition to appellant Attorney 97-29 for violating Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 7.3 prohibiting solicitation of professional employment over the telephone. A hearing panel affirmed the admonition concluding that although three telephone calls in January 1997 did not constitute a rule violation, the initial telephone call to complainant in December 1996 did violate Rule 7.3. We hold that the panel’s findings are not clearly erroneous and therefore affirm the private admonition.
Appellant is an attorney in firm…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Florida Bar v. Went for It, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Texans Against Censorship v. State Bar of TexasDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1995
- In Re TeichnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- In re X.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Panel Case No. 17289Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003