Leo HEIDEMAN and Shirley Heideman, Appellants, v. PFL, INC., Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Leo and Shirley Heideman appeal from an order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment in favor of PFL, Inc., on the Heidemans’ age discrimination claims relating to Leo Heideman’s discharge by his employer PFL. Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 710 F.Supp. 711 (W.D.Mo. 1989). We affirm.
Leo Heideman, who was born in 1926, was employed by PFL, 2 a wholesale food distributor headquartered in Duluth, Minnesota, from 1964 until his discharge in 1979. During most of that time, his office was in his home in Kansas City. Late in 1978, at which time Heideman held the position of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Jakimas v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Donald A. JENSEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Connie M. Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Incorporated, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Amp Incorporated, Formerly Known as Carroll Touch Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Edmond C. Teumer v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- David Hulsey, and Gary Davis v. Kmart, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.