Legal Opinion

State v. Barber

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1970No. 7023SC378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

During the presentation of the State’s evidence a witness volunteered the statement that defendant “is AWOL from the Army”. Defendant’s objection and motion to strike were allowed, and the trial judge promptly and clearly instructed the jury to disregard the statement. Defendant immediately moved for a mistrial upon the grounds that the volunteered statement was prejudicial, and assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to order a mistrial. When the objectionable evidence is stricken and the jury instructed not to consider it, any prejudice is ordinarily cured. State v. Barrow, 276 N.C.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BarrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API