Legal Opinion

In Re O'Farrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2011No. 29S00-0902-DI-76PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Discipline Action

2Per curiam

This matter is before the Court on the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission’s “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action,” and on the post-hearing briefing by the parties. The Respondent’s 1995 admission to this state’s bar subjects her to this Court’s disciplinary jurisdiction. See Ind. Const, art. 7, § 4.

We find that Respondent, Heather McClure O’Farrell, engaged in attorney misconduct by making agreements for and charging unreasonable fees in violation of Indiana Professional…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of CoopermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. FrerichsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  5. In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. EarhartKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Matter of Everett E. Powell, IIIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In the Matter of Justin R. WallIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In re EarhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re O'FarrellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API