Legal Opinion

United States v. Franklin Truesdale

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 17, 1968No. 516, Docket 32057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, tried before a judge sitting without jury, was found to have,violated 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174 by selling 23.2 grams of heroin to a narcotics agent. He seeks a reversal of his conviction on two grounds, first that he did not receive a fair trial because of alleged governmental prejudicial misconduct in failing to produce a “special employee,” and second that the trial judge required him to surrender his privilege against self-incrimination in order to provide a basis for requesting that the employee be produced. We affirm the conviction.

The government case may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. McCarthyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. United States v. Braj Nandan SinghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. People v. LawNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Braj Nandan SinghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API