Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Young v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 12, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action in six counts, each on the bond (for years 1923 to 1928 inclusive) required for merchant's license tax under Section 11306, R.S. 1939 (Sec. 10078, Mo. Stat. Ann. 8063, amended Laws 1935, p. 407) in the form provided by Section 11308, R.S. 1939. (Section 10080, Mo. Stat. Ann. 8064, amended Laws 1935, p. 407.) Recovery is sought for four times the amount of revenue found to be due for State and county taxes for each of these years, because it is [298] alleged that false statements were filed, under the provisions of Section 11317, R.S. 1939. [Section 10089, Mo. Stat. Ann.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boonville National Bank v. SchlotzhauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. Merchants & Miners BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Thornburg v. School District No. 3Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. May Department Stores Co. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. Cupples Hesse Corporation v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. GarveySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API