Legal Opinion
Quaife v. Brady Martz & Associates, P.C.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided May 22, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00176Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA EASTERN DIVISION Jason Quaife, John Hoffer, Amanda ) Koffler, and Alec R. Kiesow, on behalf of ) themselves individually and all others ) similarly situated, ) ORDER ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 3:23-cv-176 vs. ) ) Brady, Martz & Associates, P.C., ) ) Defendant. ) Defendant Brady Martz & Associates, P.C. (“Brady Martz”) moves to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint for lack of jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Federal Rule…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Christopher Gorog v. Best Buy Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Jupin v. KaskMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- In Re: St. Jude Medical, Inc., Silzone Heart Valve Products Liability Litigation. Lester Grovatt Beatrice Bailey Levy D. Redden Bonnie L. Sliger Joe W. Sanchez, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., Product Liability Advisory Council, Incorporated Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, Amicus on Behalf of State of Minnesota Public Citizen, Public Citizen, Incorporated Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association, Amicus on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.