Legal Opinion
Rothman Realty Corp. v. MacLain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 1, 1951PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 280 (1951)
84 A.2d 482
ROTHMAN REALTY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RAY V. MacLAIN AND ARTHUR WARREN MACK, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 1, 1951.
Mr. Warren Dixon, Jr., attorney for plaintiff.
Mr. Abram A. Lebson, attorney for defendants.
GRIMSHAW, J.S.C.
Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the real estate business in Bergen County. Both defendants were salesmen employed by the plaintiff under a contract which reads as follows:
"In consideration of employment by the Rothman Realty Corp., I * * * agree and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lippincott v. ContentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Dixon v. Smyth Sales Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Hinds v. HenrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- John v. United Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Matter of T & H Diner, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- General Electric Co. v. E. Fred Sulzer and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Rothman Realty Corp. v. MacLainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.