Legal Opinion

People v. J.J.H.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 5, 2001No. 99SC447PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

In this case, we address the sentencing requirements applicable to a juvenile charged as a mandatory sentence offender. The ju venile argued, and the court of appeals agreed in People v. J.J.H., 992 P.2d 626 (Colo.App.1999), that the court should have required the prosecutor to prove any previous delinquency adjudications to the court beyond a reasonable doubt as a predicate to determining that J.J.H. should be sentenced as a mandatory sentence offender. We disagree. The Colorado Children's Code governs, and it requires additional procedures only in the case of an alleged aggravated juvenile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. S.G.W. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. AC, IV v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. McMillin v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. People in Interest of TMSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Colorado Water Conservation Board v. Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Bostelman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  4. A.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. People v. LassekColorado Court of Appeals · 2005

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API