Legal Opinion
Cont'l Cas. Co. v. C.D. Stimson Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 14, 2018No. Case No. C17-235 RSMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*1319This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs Continental Casualty Company and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (collectively referred to herein as "CNA"), and by Defendant C.D. Stimson Company ("Stimson"). Dkts. # 18 and # 22. CNA moves for an order declaring it does not owe Stimson a duty to defend for conditions being placed on its permit to redevelop its commercial property. Stimson moves only for summary judgment on the issue of CNA's duty to indemnify Stimson. For the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.