Legal Opinion

Donlan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 18, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to the defendant, and complaint dismissed with appropriate costs in the court below.

Plaintiff sues to recover the proceeds of three policies of insurance of the industrial type containing the so-called “ facility of payment ” clauses. Plaintiff paid the premiums and retained possession of the policies until the death of the insured. At the time of the issuance of the third policy, in which the estate of the insured was designated beneficiary, defendant’s agent represented that plaintiff would be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shea v. United States Industrial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. McCarthy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Kasper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Zahn v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Craig v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donlan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API