Legal Opinion

Zahn v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal is by permission of this court from an order or determination of the Appellate Term, Second Department, affirming a judgment for plaintiff in the Municipal Court. She there recovered about $200, the amount payable on two policies of insurance containing a “ facility of payment ” clause. The insured had *232lived a considerable portion of the time in the family of the plaintiff, and was a friend of her late husband and herself. He had limited earning capacity and to a certain extent the plaintiff provided for his support. The insured had no property and no known relatives. Plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shea v. United States Industrial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. McCarthy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Foryciarz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. McCarthy v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baginska v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  2. Rawlings v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Donlan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  4. Donlan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. In re the Estate of GrassoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API