Legal Opinion

The Trane Company, a Division of American Standard, Inc. v. Whitehurst-Lassen Construction Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 24, 1989No. 88-7543PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from an action that a supplier, The Trane Company (“Trane”), filed against a general contractor, White-hurst-Lassen Construction Company (“Whitehurst-Lassen”), and the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (“USF & 6”) on September 10, 1987. The suit alleges a breach of a labor and material payment bond required under the Alabama Public Works Statute, Ala.Code § 39-1-1 (1975). The district court entered judgment for the general contractor and surety. We reverse.

I. Background

A. Facts

Whitehurst-Lassen and the Shelby County Board of Education entered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States of America, F/u/b/o Krupp Steel Products, Inc., D/B/A Diversified Steel Services v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Graybar Electric Company, Inc. v. John A. Volpe Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Moyer v. United States, for Use of Trane Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  5. Warrior Constructors, Inc. v. Harders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Graybar Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Krupp Steel Products, Inc., D/B/A Diversified Steel Services, Cross-Appellant v. Aetna Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee. United States of America, F/u/b/o Krupp Steel Products, Inc., D/B/A Diversified Steel Services v. Aetna Insurance Company, United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Krupp Steel Products, Inc., D/B/A Diversified Steel Services v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. United States Department of the Navy for the Benefit of Andrews v. Delta Contractors Corp. & Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1995
  4. United States ex rel. Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Aetna InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States Ex Rel. GE Supply v. G & C Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API