Legal Opinion

Teeter Motor Co., Inc. v. FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 13, 1976No. 76-185PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

By the terms of a Financing and Security Agreement, appellee agreed to advance funds to appellant for the floor-planning of new and used cars to be sold by appellant. About two years later, after appellant had encountered financial difficulties, appellee took possession of appellant’s automobile stock pursuant to their agreement and liquidated it. Appellee then filed suit for a deficiency judgment for the balance of the debt owed by appellant. From the chancellor’s decree in favor of appellee comes this appeal.

Appellant first “contends that the Agreement for disposal of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Southern California First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Nowlin v. Professional Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  3. Nichols v. Tower Grove BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. HerringSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. H. Ray Rogers, D/B/A Ray Rogers Company v. Allis-Chalmers Credit Corp., Chiles Tractor and MacHinery CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. Oaklawn Bank v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Walker v. Grant County Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API