Commonwealth v. McGillicuddy
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Trexler, J.,
There are a number of assignments of error, but we will confine our discussion to the matters presented in the statement of questions involved. We have, however, con-' sidered all the assignments and find merit in none of them.(1) The district attorney was allowed to ask certain character witnesses called by the defendant whether defendant’s reputation had been the subject of conversation. The appellant contends that when a witness has heard nothing bad about a man it is evidence of good character, that negative testimony of this kind may be regarded as bearing favorably…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PrincipattiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Commonwealth v. RobzinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. BrandlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. EngleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. BeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Commonwealth v. MashieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Chiccarello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933