Legal Opinion

Cure v. Board of Hodgeman County Comm'rs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1998No. 79,284PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

This is an election contest based on alleged violations of the statutory provisions governing advance voting, K.S.A. 25-1117 et seq. On April 1, 1997, the voters of Hodgeman County said “no” to the question whether corporate hog production facilities should be permitted within the geographical boundaries of their county. Anthony Cure and Emmett Aistrup (Contestants), voters registered in the county, asked the district court to set aside the election results and order that the question be resubmitted. The district court upheld the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re the Appeal of Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Lewis v. GriffithMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Riley v. ClaytonMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hooper v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Lambeth v. LevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Adkins v. HuckabaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. In Re Estate of AntonopoulosSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  5. Families Against Corporate Takeover v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API